CASE STUDY

[Japan] We had been using a multimeter to check analog signals on equipment such as I/P converters. Since the multimeter had to be connected in series with the equipment, it was necessary to either shut down the equipment or prepare additional wiring in advance. As a result, troubleshooting typically took 30 to 60 minutes.

[Italy] Without going over-budget, there was no multimeter that was satisfactory in every respect, including: Analog meters: transient response, precision, susceptibility to static buildup, and durability. Digital meters: readability, functions, and the operation of the auto power‑off feature.

[Japan] When using a power meter, connecting the voltage test leads to the terminals one by one was cumbersome, and we were concerned that the clips might come loose during measurement.

[Japan] We used to disconnect cables to test signal converters, which was time-consuming and required a lot of effort.

[Japan] We had been using an older clamp meter, which made it difficult to take measurements in areas with densely packed wiring, making circuit checks more time-consuming. Since it did not include multimeter functions, we also had to carry a separate card-type tester, which required the additional hassle of winding and managing test leads.

[Japan] There was an installation job for an EV/PHEV charger, but although it was installed, we were unable to verify whether the charger was functioning properly, so we had to confirm proper operation using the customer’s PHEV.

[India] With our existing multimeters, we frequently experienced issues with erroneous readings, which reduced the reliability of electrical diagnostics during powertrain testing and sometimes even led to misleading conclusions. In addition, the manual range-selection knob required us to repeatedly switch between voltage ranges during testing, making the process slow and cumbersome, and significantly decreasing our overall efficiency.

[Saudi Arabia] I have been struggling with lower-quality measuring instruments that provide unstable readings in high-temperature and high-humidity environments.  I often had to repeat tests multiple times until we felt confident in the results, which wasted time on-site. With other earth testers, we faced significant 'noise' interference which made it difficult to get a stable reading in urban areas.

[Saudi Arabia] I have been struggling with lower-quality measuring instruments that provide unstable readings in high-temperature and high-humidity environments. I often had to repeat tests multiple times to feel confident in the results, which wasted time on-site. I previously used instruments with poor ergonomics and weak cable connections. In tight electrical panels, common clamp meters were difficult to handle.